|
| |||
Recent Comments by NetRunner
 | comment listing type: 
Top New Election Videos by Vote Recent Searches
Subscribe Top 15 Election Sifters of All Time Top 10 Election Sifters of the Past Week Top 10 Lounge Lizards  Newest Appreciated Comments           | ||
View Mobile VideoSift
bookmarklet - page width: fixed - loose
Copyright © Sift Partners, Inc. 2006-2012
Terms and Conditions - Contact Us - VideoSift Staff
page generated on web1 in 0.8395 seconds
Powered by Varo CMS by Rommel Santor
bookmarklet - page width: fixed - loose
Copyright © Sift Partners, Inc. 2006-2012
Terms and Conditions - Contact Us - VideoSift Staff
page generated on web1 in 0.8395 seconds
Powered by Varo CMS by Rommel Santor
Republicans Collect Money From Programs They Called Fascism
"Michigan's Attorney General, Mike Cox" ... and his fellow petition signers Mike Hunt, Dick Hurtz and Hugh G. Rection...
You forgot Harry Johnson.
How To Sit Behind Mitt
>> ^raverman:
@NetRunner totally agree...
Actually the nomination of Romney suggest that democracy might have operational limits. That a population must have a minimum level of intelligence, education, and freedom from indoctirnation so that they are capable of recognizing which candidates are representative... and which are not.
If people are too uneducated or too indoctrinatated by Fox, then you're only going through the motions
Shep Smith: GOP on "Wrong Side of History" on Gay Marriage
Obama Endorses Same Sex-Marriage
To me, that looks like you're trying to step on a positive story to try to minimize any bump in his popularity, because you're worried it'll make him harder to defeat when he's up for election.
I think it's sweet that you say you care about issues and stuff, but do you really advance any sort of cause by trying to make the War on Terror into something that's all Obama's fault? By trying to make the bad economy all Obama's fault? You think you have some sort of shot at electing someone better than Obama in November?
I understand why Republicans and Libertarians talk like that, but what's your deal? You think you're saving the world from Obama's reign of
gay prideterror?The Campaign
How To Sit Behind Mitt
Mitt Romney seems to have been hated by basically everyone, seems to have zero personal charisma, is completely out of touch with how normal people live their lives, and it's virtually impossible to find an issue on which Romney hasn't been on both sides of during his political career. It's not really a surprise that he's a joke right out of the gate.
If Romney wins, it'll be a signal to the rest of the world that America is either no longer a democracy, or is now so completely overrun with people who have no grasp on reality that it probably shouldn't exist anymore.
And I honestly think there's a 40% chance Romney will win, because there's an awful lot of people with no grasp on reality here...
>> ^raverman:
Is it just me or is Mitt Romney a laughing stock before he even starts campaigning in earnest?
I don't remember people making fun of McCain like this (or much at all until the Palin twist)
NMA: Are you smarter than an American? ...
Long answer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territories_of_the_United_States
Also, the woman who said "Philippines" would've been right if the question had been asked 80 years ago. The girl who said "Louisiana" would've been right if the question had been asked 200 years ago.
>> ^Yogi:
I got everything but US Territory...isn't that just a state or something? What do they mean by Territory?
Bill OReilly "Kidnap Harry Reid and waterboard Nanci Pelosi"
Obama Endorses Same Sex-Marriage
It's a historic moment, and y'all are pissed because he didn't do it sooner/more vociferously/in a dress to the tune of It's Rainin' Men.
Obama: "Same Sex Couples Should Be Able To Get Married"
Obama Comes Out...In favor of Gay Marriage
Obama: "Same Sex Couples Should Be Able To Get Married"
Shep Smith: GOP on "Wrong Side of History" on Gay Marriage
Keep it classy, Fox.
Boise_Lib
In reply to this comment by Boise_Lib:
*promote
How Did Mitt Romney Get So Obscenely Rich?
Short version: you have to limit your study to only the impact of the most progressive tax in existence (the federal income tax) in order to come away thinking poor people are somehow getting off the hook more than rich people when it comes to taxes.